EVE Search - Sticky:[Rhea] The Confessor

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Sticky:[Rhea] The Confessor

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 7 post(s)
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 406	Posted - 2014.11.27 19:02:57 - [1] - Quote No drones? Would be ideal to have some drones methinks.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 406	Posted - 2014.11.27 19:13:01 - [2] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Role Bonus: 95% reduction in Scan Probe Launcher CPU requirements Can we get a confirmation that this isn't a typo and that it indeed applies to combat probe launchers?
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 406	Posted - 2014.11.27 19:16:44 - [3] - Quote Noxisia Arkana wrote: Harvey James wrote: why does it get a bonus to scan probes? cause frigate/destroyer sized wormholes. Its a thing that now has a special ship. It appears to be to combat probe launchers, otherwise they wouldn't be needing a cpu reduction for the module. Waiting for dev confirmation for this, but combat probing on these will make them invaluable for lowsec pvp.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 407	Posted - 2014.11.27 21:01:03 - [4] - Quote Valid Point wrote: Please make the minmatar t3 destroyer vertical Or the gallente one. Myrm is pretty.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 409	Posted - 2014.11.28 02:57:05 - [5] - Quote I think the lack of drones or tracking speed bonuses on this ship will make it pretty vulnerable to brawlers getting under its guns. That said, I think it's a good balance to it; i just wish that it had a 20/40 drone bay or a full flight of flights. Idk it just looks like it might have some problems without a tracking speed bonus or a few drones.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 409	Posted - 2014.11.28 05:06:18 - [6] - Quote FT Diomedes wrote: Catherine Laartii wrote: I think the lack of drones or tracking speed bonuses on this ship will make it pretty vulnerable to brawlers getting under its guns. That said, I think it's a good balance to it; i just wish that it had a 20/40 drone bay or a full flight of flights. Idk it just looks like it might have some problems without a tracking speed bonus or a few drones. Not every ship in the game needs a drone bay. Particularly frigate and destroyer hulls. It's a destroyer without a tracking bonus to its guns. Call me old-fashioned, but that seems a little off to me. Adding some drones, especially since it's an amarr boat, doesn't seem too outlandish an idea to me.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 413	Posted - 2014.11.28 19:28:02 - [7] - Quote Kesthely wrote: Daichi Yamato wrote: The lack of tracking may relegate it to sniping, but the alternative means its too strong. basically i anticipate the defensive sub being used little on this particular d3. Other d3's on the other hand will likely behave differently. no thanks to Covert cloak pls. wouldnt mind a small % bonus to mwd sig penalty when using the propulsion mode though. Are you kidding me? i'm actually affraid the defensive mode will be to overpowered, it looks like you can put an oversized afterburner on, and with links and implants you'll have a less then 20 sig radius destroyer, capable of doing 180 ish dps @ 10 km while orbiting at roughly 1800 m/s with the option to go switch to go in long range mode and aurora and reach 60 km (although you gain a lot of sig) or beef up your speed to 2.5km/s With the combination of insane resists, (base T2, 33% defensive + modules & Link) you'll be at over 80% accross the board with probably at least 2 in the 90's and that for a price of roughly 50-60 m fitted. And this is all BEFORE you overheat The lack of a tracking speed bonus will make this scenario HIGHLY impractical. The coercer already has enough trouble with tracking close-up, and without any kind of tracking bonus whatsoever I think you'll see a lot of lossmails from people who let ships get up under their guns.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 416	Posted - 2014.11.29 05:23:11 - [8] - Quote Warde Guildencrantz wrote: Vodka Kovalevski wrote: rokh,moa that's not native dipsh Catherine Laartii wrote: Valid Point wrote:** Please make the minmatar t3 destroyer vertical Or the gallente one. Myrm is pretty. +1 for vertical destroyer moreover, wouldn't mind a vertical caldari ship. Heron is nice. Unfortunately, in the concept art for caldari there were no design specs released for a vertical ship. They may yet change that, so I have my fingers crossed.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 418	Posted - 2014.11.30 07:20:14 - [9] - Quote Please, PLEASE get rid of the bloody cap usage bonus, and increase the cap regen and amount rate appropriately to compensate. It needs a tracking speed bonus or drones, and it has neither.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 419	Posted - 2014.11.30 17:20:05 - [10] - Quote Syrias Bizniz wrote: Reaver Glitterstim wrote: I'm surprised it's less than a Cormorant. I figured with the tracking computers that you can't take advantage of on a Cormorant, the Confessor would get more range. Well, it's without a tracking comp. the corm DOES have a total of a 100% optimal bonus, and if I'm not mistaken, rails still have a relatively longer optimal range.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 421	Posted - 2014.12.01 11:21:56 - [11] - Quote CCP Fozzie wrote: Role Bonus: 95% reduction in Scan Probe Launcher CPU requirements Please fix this so it reads "95% reduction in combat probe launcher CPU requirements", since that's what we're guessing you mean.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 423	Posted - 2014.12.01 19:49:20 - [12] - Quote Goldensaver wrote: Arla Sarain wrote: AnimeHeretic wrote: There is no dedicated combat proper. Not a single one . It is either a gimp fit dictor or a cloaky. You've named 2 just now, although the cloaky is what its meant to be. AnimeHeretic wrote: This will be the FIRST ship in eve that can scan something, Warp to it, and hold it while backup lands. It will also be a ship that can do the job of 2 ships. Scan something, warp to it and kill it. . Just saying, neither of those is dedicated to be an on-grid combat scanner. One has the task of catching and holding supercaps, and the fact that it ongrid probes is just a result of it not bothering with guns since it's not going to be doing ** for damage with all its tank. The other is not a combat ship. It's at most a support ship that can help its fleet get into position with ongrid fleet warps. It is far better in its role of scanning down lone ships, finding sigs/sites, and hacking and the sort. It's not really a dedicated ongrid prober/warper. No toes are being stepped on here. The Confesser will never be able to scan down an OGB or any other decently "hidden" ship. Catherine Laartii wrote:** the corm DOES have a total of a 100% optimal bonus, and if I'm not mistaken, rails still have a relatively longer optimal range. 125% my dear. Something to remember is that when there are multiple bonuses to the same stat, they compound on each other. 1 * 1.5 * 1.5 = 2.25 DUUUUDE I REMEMBER YOU FROM MY CORP!!!
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 424	Posted - 2014.12.02 19:50:31 - [13] - Quote Syrias Bizniz wrote: X Gallentius wrote: This thing isn't a souped up T1 destroyer, it's a souped up Interdictor. Resist profile + other stats look more like T2 dessie than T1 dessie. Fleets of these things are going to rule everywhere. They will clear out support ships like nobody's business and make fleet warfare very monolithic. Small plexes just got real boring as well. If 'fleets of these' are going to rule everywhere, why aren't we seeing Heretic-Fleets yet that dominate everything? EHP is the same, DPS at Range is similar, too. The answer is obvious: Cause these things will get shot down by 5 Ishtars in a few seconds. Also, since Tech 3 cruisers can't enter Medium Plexes, i'll just assume Tech 3 dessies can't enter smalls. Haven't tested yet, though. It was explicitly stated that t3 destroyers will be able to enter smalls. Also, the obvious answer and correcting both of you is that for every 1 t2 ship there can be afforded 10 or 100 t1 derp frigs. Getting the bejeezus mobbed out of you is why you don't see t2 cruisers and destroyers more often; unless you're Snuff Box it's not very cost effective and not very viable. T3 Cruisers are a different story because of their durability and flexibility (covops cloak for example).
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 428	Posted - 2014.12.04 21:14:15 - [14] - Quote AnimeHeretic wrote: Still not a single dev reply. Honestly I would be good if the laser cap bonus was dropped for a tracking bonus. And it had a bit more base hp. But it will. Likely release as is. Whelp. Hoping this is the case. They could drop the cap usage bonus and up the cap regen a bunch and it'd be a helluva lot better than the current setup. Cap usage bonus=wasted, pointless bonus that can be rolled into the ship or eliminated entirely.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 433	Posted - 2014.12.07 21:36:23 - [15] - Quote I can say I'm going already going to be a lot more impressed by the caldari and minmatar destroyers when they come out; assuming the Caldari one does missiles and the minmatar one does projectiles, they likely won't see the same issues with capacitor and tracking speed that the Confessor will have. Pray that the gallente don't get a drone t3 destroyer.
Catherine Laartii Dominion Fleet Group Templis CALSF 437	Posted - 2014.12.15 14:18:32 - [16] - Quote Rowells wrote: Thedaius wrote: Rowells wrote: Thedaius wrote: Have they released in what site types the small hull sections are going to drop in? I've run several of the new relic sites in the shattered planets... and nothing; I haven't run the old relic sites... Are they intended to be really rare? If so these ships will never become a viable build option... Would appreciate some knowledge on how to obtain these! Thanks. they have, im not sure of the rarity or anything, but theyve already built a couple confessors and ive seen the parts for sale at like 200-300 mil gonna have to wait till the market settles down I am aware they exist; but usually with a release like this they usually provide details as to what site the new items can be found... Here: CCP Fozzie wrote: with blueprints invented from new Small Hull Section relics that can be obtained from derelict talocan ships in sleeper sites. These derelict talocan ships...are they found in c4 upwards, or are they available to be found in c1-c3?

Copyright © 2006-2025, Chribba - OMG Labs. All Rights Reserved. - perf 0,05s, ref 20251027/0323
EVE-Online™ and Eve imagery © CCP.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.